HTC Desire 700 / HTC Desire 700 / HTC Desire 709d

SIM 1 GSM 850/900/1800/1900, SIM 2: GSM 900/1800/1900 HSDPA 850/900/2100 ; 5" 540 x 960 pixel Super LCD2 capacitive touchscreen, 220 ppi ; Android OS v4.1.2 Jelly Bean with Sense UI 5.0 ; Spreadtrum Shark chipset, quad-core Cortex-A7 CPU @1.2GHz,...

Not competitively priced (€300 at the time of writing) ; Budget-grade chipset ; Disappointing camera output in both stills and video ; 5" screen a tad thin on resolution ; No 3G support on the secondary SIM card ; No carrier video-call support ; Poor...

The Desire 700 dual sim has a good mix of features and tries to position itself as a low cost alternative of the One flagship, which is a good way to start. What the Desire 700 dual sim has in its favor is a 5" display of qHD resolution, two SIM card...

Very good call quality ; Active dual SIM functionality ; Long battery life ; Strong stereo speakers ; Very fast camera

Screen definition is lacking ; Tall, somewhat uncomfortable to carry in a pocket ; Slippery back cover that attracts fingerprints ; Camera underexposes the scenes by default ; Video recording runs less fluid at 22fps ; Only 4.7 GB of user-available...

In the market for a good dual SIM handset from a reputable vendor? Then the HTC Desire 700 should be near the top of your list, as the handset sports dual active SIM support, mixed with excellent call and audio quality, thanks to the BoomSound speakers...

• Impressive design ; • Decent spec sheet ; • Good sound quality ; • USB on the go ; • Dual-SIM ; • Decent camera

• Older Android version ; • Reflective screen ; • Not competitively priced ; • No NFC ; • Lacks quick settings toggles in Sense 5

On a scale of one to ten, HTC Desire 700 deserves a minimum of 7 points largely due to its impressive design structure and and overall user experience. But the inclusion of old Android version might keep the consumers away as the handset like Moto G,...

1. One of the few CDMA+GSM smartphones in the market ; 2. Decent screen ; 3. High speaker output

Looks good, Well built, Decent real world performance

Shockingly bad benchmarks performance, Terrible value for money, Low-res screen

Looks good ; Well built ; Decent real world performance

Shockingly bad benchmarks performance ; Terrible value for money ; Low-res screen